<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing It Up on Twitter &amp; FriendFeed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wallen&#39;s</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-5195</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallen&#39;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-5195</guid>
		<description>Fully agree Phil. I have to say that there is intrinsically a lot of noise in Twitter and that this &quot;gaming&quot; is just increasing it. I decided early on to follow only a small number of people. The implication is that I sometime unfollow people where I see I have limited common interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully agree Phil. I have to say that there is intrinsically a lot of noise in Twitter and that this &#8220;gaming&#8221; is just increasing it. I decided early on to follow only a small number of people. The implication is that I sometime unfollow people where I see I have limited common interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallen&#39;s</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-5153</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallen&#39;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-5153</guid>
		<description>Fully agree Phil. I have to say that there is intrinsically a lot of noise in Twitter and that this &quot;gaming&quot; is just increasing it. I decided early on to follow only a small number of people. The implication is that I sometime unfollow people where I see I have limited common interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully agree Phil. I have to say that there is intrinsically a lot of noise in Twitter and that this &#8220;gaming&#8221; is just increasing it. I decided early on to follow only a small number of people. The implication is that I sometime unfollow people where I see I have limited common interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wallen&#39;s</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4958</link>
		<dc:creator>Wallen&#39;s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 08:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4958</guid>
		<description>Fully agree Phil. I have to say that there is intrinsically a lot of noise in Twitter and that this &quot;gaming&quot; is just increasing it. I decided early on to follow only a small number of people. The implication is that I sometime unfollow people where I see I have limited common interests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fully agree Phil. I have to say that there is intrinsically a lot of noise in Twitter and that this &#8220;gaming&#8221; is just increasing it. I decided early on to follow only a small number of people. The implication is that I sometime unfollow people where I see I have limited common interests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julienWallen (julienwallen)</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4965</link>
		<dc:creator>julienWallen (julienwallen)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 07:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4965</guid>
		<description>Interesting post by &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://twitter.com/eng1ne&quot;&gt;@eng1ne&lt;/a&gt; on follow-unfollow &quot;gaming&quot; on Twitter: http://tinyurl.com/8qmt4n</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post by <a rel="nofollow" href="http://twitter.com/eng1ne">@eng1ne</a> on follow-unfollow &#8220;gaming&#8221; on Twitter: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/8qmt4n" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/8qmt4n</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4956</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4956</guid>
		<description>Right, exactly.  I guess it&#039;s not rocket science -- people will follow who they want for whatever reason they want.  So really just knowing that should prove reflexively that I should also follow who I want.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The upshot will be services that I enjoy more and provide me with more of a return on my time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, exactly.  I guess it&#39;s not rocket science &#8212; people will follow who they want for whatever reason they want.  So really just knowing that should prove reflexively that I should also follow who I want.</p>
<p>The upshot will be services that I enjoy more and provide me with more of a return on my time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4955</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4955</guid>
		<description>Sounds like the process I&#039;m going to kick off soon.  Keep working on it, you&#039;ll get there!  And thanks for the compliment, much appreciated!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the process I&#39;m going to kick off soon.  Keep working on it, you&#39;ll get there!  And thanks for the compliment, much appreciated!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technacea</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4954</link>
		<dc:creator>technacea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4954</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing Phil. I came to a similar conclusion early on. I don&#039;t follow everyone that follows me. I check out their stream and if I &quot;smell&quot; gaming going on I avoid them. On the other hand, I follow several thought leaders that don&#039;t follow me back - and I&#039;m fine with that. I&#039;m following them because they are providing great information and commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing Phil. I came to a similar conclusion early on. I don&#39;t follow everyone that follows me. I check out their stream and if I &#8220;smell&#8221; gaming going on I avoid them. On the other hand, I follow several thought leaders that don&#39;t follow me back &#8211; and I&#39;m fine with that. I&#39;m following them because they are providing great information and commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4953</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 04:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4953</guid>
		<description>The reason I used Bob instead of some jackoff enterepreneur-type is because he is really trying to present a &#039;normal guy&#039; front both on Twitter and on the blog. But from what I can tell, he is far from it. He&#039;s gaming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason I used Bob instead of some jackoff enterepreneur-type is because he is really trying to present a &#39;normal guy&#39; front both on Twitter and on the blog. But from what I can tell, he is far from it. He&#39;s gaming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orangejack</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4952</link>
		<dc:creator>orangejack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 01:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4952</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been working through this same thing myself.  I used to follow most who followed me. After a while it was too noisy and I was trying to keep up.  So I unfollowed some.  Then I realized I&#039;m not going to keep up so I refollowed some.  Now I&#039;m using FriendFeed to filter out the people I want to keep up with.  Even that is noisy.  Same with Facebook.  But I&#039;m kinda going back now to &quot;who do I want to be connected with&quot; not &quot;who do I have to keep up with&quot;.  Or something like that.  BTW, nice blog, just subbed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ve been working through this same thing myself.  I used to follow most who followed me. After a while it was too noisy and I was trying to keep up.  So I unfollowed some.  Then I realized I&#39;m not going to keep up so I refollowed some.  Now I&#39;m using FriendFeed to filter out the people I want to keep up with.  Even that is noisy.  Same with Facebook.  But I&#39;m kinda going back now to &#8220;who do I want to be connected with&#8221; not &#8220;who do I have to keep up with&#8221;.  Or something like that.  BTW, nice blog, just subbed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4951</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 20:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4951</guid>
		<description>First thanks for the thoughtful reply, Dave.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The situation you describe is reasonable, and I don&#039;t think anyone should really take offense at.  And I may actually be guilty of labeling people with a lot of followers who follow/un-follow me quickly as gamers instead of people who decided I had too many FriendFeed links in my Twitter stream, etc.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the bottom line is that, at least for me, I need to un-couple the activities of people following me with my own activities on Twitter.  The two shouldn&#039;t have a direct relationship.  And when I re-visit who I *want* to follow, I will also throw away any expectations of them following me back, or following people who follow me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In other words, if someone on Twitter or FriendFeed comes to my attention, via a blog or because they follow me there, I then will attempt to make a judgment based on my interests and what I am looking for, to follow them.  And by doing that., by making that single decision, I am free of the dual burdens of mutual following and stress over why they aren&#039;t following me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It reduces the only question down to, who do I really want to follow?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First thanks for the thoughtful reply, Dave.</p>
<p>The situation you describe is reasonable, and I don&#39;t think anyone should really take offense at.  And I may actually be guilty of labeling people with a lot of followers who follow/un-follow me quickly as gamers instead of people who decided I had too many FriendFeed links in my Twitter stream, etc.</p>
<p>But the bottom line is that, at least for me, I need to un-couple the activities of people following me with my own activities on Twitter.  The two shouldn&#39;t have a direct relationship.  And when I re-visit who I *want* to follow, I will also throw away any expectations of them following me back, or following people who follow me.</p>
<p>In other words, if someone on Twitter or FriendFeed comes to my attention, via a blog or because they follow me there, I then will attempt to make a judgment based on my interests and what I am looking for, to follow them.  And by doing that., by making that single decision, I am free of the dual burdens of mutual following and stress over why they aren&#39;t following me.</p>
<p>It reduces the only question down to, who do I really want to follow?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daveferrick</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4950</link>
		<dc:creator>daveferrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 18:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4950</guid>
		<description>I wonder if I come across as a gamer. I routinely follow people I meet in various services and through occasional searches. Aside from reading a page or two of their tweets, I don&#039;t do much research before adding them, opting instead to learn about them from their updates. If after a few days I notice I haven&#039;t paid much attention to their tweets or if the content is mostly negative, I tend to unfollow them as my mind has now categorized them as noise. Nothing against what they have to offer. It&#039;s just not ringing home with me. This doesn&#039;t happen very often but it does happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I know you&#039;re speaking of accounts that blatantly game other users at a much higher rate and we need to help fix that. I hope unfollowing doesn&#039;t suddenly carry a negative vibe. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s not you. It&#039;s me. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if I come across as a gamer. I routinely follow people I meet in various services and through occasional searches. Aside from reading a page or two of their tweets, I don&#39;t do much research before adding them, opting instead to learn about them from their updates. If after a few days I notice I haven&#39;t paid much attention to their tweets or if the content is mostly negative, I tend to unfollow them as my mind has now categorized them as noise. Nothing against what they have to offer. It&#39;s just not ringing home with me. This doesn&#39;t happen very often but it does happen.</p>
<p>I know you&#39;re speaking of accounts that blatantly game other users at a much higher rate and we need to help fix that. I hope unfollowing doesn&#39;t suddenly carry a negative vibe. </p>
<p>It&#39;s not you. It&#39;s me. <img src='http://www.scribkin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4949</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4949</guid>
		<description>I hope I don&#039;t accidentally un-follow folks that are actively engaged with me and my blog.  As for saying hi.. HI!  But this is exactly my point -- I want to be able to be MORE responsive to those people I follow.  And I know the path for doing that is following the folks I find really interesting and who engage me in conversation and ideas.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So in other words, I intend to dedicate more of my attention to (perhaps fewer) people based more on what I find interesting and compelling about them, rather than a somewhat arbitrary rule of you-follow-me, I-follow-you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope I don&#39;t accidentally un-follow folks that are actively engaged with me and my blog.  As for saying hi.. HI!  But this is exactly my point &#8212; I want to be able to be MORE responsive to those people I follow.  And I know the path for doing that is following the folks I find really interesting and who engage me in conversation and ideas.</p>
<p>So in other words, I intend to dedicate more of my attention to (perhaps fewer) people based more on what I find interesting and compelling about them, rather than a somewhat arbitrary rule of you-follow-me, I-follow-you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Kondrat</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4948</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Kondrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4948</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t unfollow me! PS. You can say Hi too you know :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t unfollow me! PS. You can say Hi too you know <img src='http://www.scribkin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4947</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4947</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you know that all us social media nerds are part of the same Borg collective, and we all think the same thoughts?  We love mulling over the same material again and again but in different virtual places!  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s like a game. Of course we know where WE post our stuff, after all, WE posted it!  But it&#039;s a very sophisticated technique we use to ensnare more people in to the collective.  We present the facade of individuality by using different types of blogs of different sizes and authors to lure unsuspecting people into our evil trap!  Mua-ha-ha!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ok, I&#039;m pulling your leg, obviously.  And I&#039;m sorry if, as a group, writing about Twitter and FriendFeed is now &#039;beating a dead horse&#039; so to speak.  But as long as those services continue to be popular, you will probably have to steel yourself against forever new posts being written.  I mean, I am totally sick of newspaper articles about outgoing president W, but they keep writing them!  ARGH!  Why can&#039;t I just not read them all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#39;t you know that all us social media nerds are part of the same Borg collective, and we all think the same thoughts?  We love mulling over the same material again and again but in different virtual places!  </p>
<p>It&#39;s like a game. Of course we know where WE post our stuff, after all, WE posted it!  But it&#39;s a very sophisticated technique we use to ensnare more people in to the collective.  We present the facade of individuality by using different types of blogs of different sizes and authors to lure unsuspecting people into our evil trap!  Mua-ha-ha!</p>
<p>Ok, I&#39;m pulling your leg, obviously.  And I&#39;m sorry if, as a group, writing about Twitter and FriendFeed is now &#39;beating a dead horse&#39; so to speak.  But as long as those services continue to be popular, you will probably have to steel yourself against forever new posts being written.  I mean, I am totally sick of newspaper articles about outgoing president W, but they keep writing them!  ARGH!  Why can&#39;t I just not read them all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4946</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:39:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4946</guid>
		<description>Thanks Martha! If this is your first visit to my blog, then welcome! Please feel free to subscribe, I promise not to overwhelm your feed reader. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Martha! If this is your first visit to my blog, then welcome! Please feel free to subscribe, I promise not to overwhelm your feed reader. <img src='http://www.scribkin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Glockner</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4945</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Glockner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4945</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s it in a nutshell!  Excellent, I&#039;m glad we see it the same way, then, and that it is working for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#39;s it in a nutshell!  Excellent, I&#39;m glad we see it the same way, then, and that it is working for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shey</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4944</link>
		<dc:creator>Shey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 13:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4944</guid>
		<description>Honestly, I&#039;ve been doing this from the start -- although I&#039;m much more picky now than ever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s hard to not follow folks when they&#039;ve decided they are interested in what you have to say. But the way I see it, I&#039;ll just be ignoring those people anyway and I&#039;ll have more time to offer those who I&#039;m really interested in.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I&#39;ve been doing this from the start &#8212; although I&#39;m much more picky now than ever.</p>
<p>It&#39;s hard to not follow folks when they&#39;ve decided they are interested in what you have to say. But the way I see it, I&#39;ll just be ignoring those people anyway and I&#39;ll have more time to offer those who I&#39;m really interested in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Shaz/NextInstinct</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4943</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Shaz/NextInstinct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4943</guid>
		<description>Everyone should chip in nuking spammers. Twitter has a priority &#039;to do&#039; list that is daunting. They&#039;ve identified internal goals, but also have demands from users, vc&#039;s, and enemies with media clout. If everyone who enjoys or benefits, helped out just seconds a day, it could be even better. How? Take one minute, click through your new followers. When see an obvious spammer, block them and report them to @spam. Let scammers feel twitter is s waste of time. Community policing is powerful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone should chip in nuking spammers. Twitter has a priority &#39;to do&#39; list that is daunting. They&#39;ve identified internal goals, but also have demands from users, vc&#39;s, and enemies with media clout. If everyone who enjoys or benefits, helped out just seconds a day, it could be even better. How? Take one minute, click through your new followers. When see an obvious spammer, block them and report them to @spam. Let scammers feel twitter is s waste of time. Community policing is powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJ Kohn</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4942</link>
		<dc:creator>AJ Kohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4942</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing a huge influx of &#039;get rich quick&#039; spammers on Twitter who also degrade the system. It&#039;s gotten to the point where I *don&#039;t* expect to follow back. That&#039;s a difference from even a month ago for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m seeing a huge influx of &#39;get rich quick&#39; spammers on Twitter who also degrade the system. It&#39;s gotten to the point where I *don&#39;t* expect to follow back. That&#39;s a difference from even a month ago for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip Tomlinson</title>
		<link>http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/comment-page-1/#comment-4941</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Tomlinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scribkin.com/2009/01/07/changing-it-up-on-twitter-friendfeed/#comment-4941</guid>
		<description>This whole followers mentality where it is used as a means of keeping score is showing people up as shallow, insecure or driven by greed. I value content over everything, and I hope the people I follow and who reciprocate that value the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole followers mentality where it is used as a means of keeping score is showing people up as shallow, insecure or driven by greed. I value content over everything, and I hope the people I follow and who reciprocate that value the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
